Friday, December 20, 2013

Noel Bednaz' Twisted Response to a Peace Offering.

In my last post, A Welcome Quiet, I made it clear that it would remain my last post if Noel Bednaz ceased her nefarious activities. She had been quiet for three days, and if that were to have continued, it could have been the end of this.

Did Noel seize that opportunity? No, of course not. Any reasonable person would have, but Noel Bednaz is a stalker, and doesn't behave like a reasonable person. Instead, she came back with a vengeance, attacking me, and attacking a very nice woman I met online only a few weeks ago - whom she is angry with for posting a single comment on this blog.

First, let me include a definition of a very common word. Anyone reading this already knows the meaning, anyone, apparently, except Noel Bednaz. The word is follow.

fol·low (fl)
v. fol·lowed, fol·low·ing, fol·lows
v.tr.


    1. To come or go after; proceed behind
    2. a) To go after in or as if in pursuit; b) To keep under surveillance
    3. a) To move along the course of; take; b) To go in the direction of; be guided by



In her most recent blog post, Noel claims to have not followed me to the two groups I had joined - a Facebook group entitled Stand Up to Cyber-Stalkers, and a group on QuitStalkingMe.com called Expose your Cyber Stalker.

The problem with Noel's claim is that it denies the very definition of follow. In both cases I had joined the group and left a single post. In both cases Noel joined the group two weeks later and left a direct response to my post. In both cases the response was her usual turn-the-tables defense that every stalker uses, ie, I'm not the stalker, he is, I'm the victim. No one who has seen my site could possibly believe that, but she still uses it, as she apparently lacks the imagination to come up with something more credible.

Nevertheless, if you join a group two weeks after your victim, with the express purpose of posting mendacious responses to what your victim has written, how is that not following?

And then she posted two blog posts. One attacking the woman who had commented on my blog, the other on her abjectly juvenile 'Follies" blog, which she wrongly calls a 'parody.'

Let's take the second one first. In the short paragraph under the idiotic graphic, she not only denies the definition of 'follow,' she admits to inflicting 'misery,' when she says "Then, the fool can't seem to shut his trap long enough to realize that doing so would save himself years of misery in the long run." Misery, coming from where? From Noel Bednaz, of course, as it has for the last thirteen years. Though I wouldn't call it misery - more like a persistent rash.

Now for the first blog, where she attacks the woman who left a comment on my blog. Not only does she again call this woman, whom I've just met, one of my "minions," (I've never had a minion), but she says she is 'into some strange shit" because her avatar references Dracula which we all know is based on a classic novel by Bram Stoker, and has been part of mainstream culture at least since the Universal film of the same name was released in 1931 - and this comes from a woman who worships Charles Manson. A photoshopped image of this woman in a gothic setting with the name Dracula in the corner is 'some strange shit.' Noel Bednaz obsession with Charles Manson? Oh, that's perfectly normal.

She also attacks this woman based on her appearance - again, let me remind you the image is photoshopped - stating that she is overweight. First, let me comment as an artist. There is no such thing as overweight. There is only healthy and unhealthy. Women (and men) come in all shapes and sizes, and that's a good thing. I (and anyone else with the maturity level of an adult) couldn't care less what someone weighs. It's what's in their heart and their head that counts. And as Noel has nothing but evil in her heart and very little in her head at all, she really shouldn't judge others.

This is a woman who constantly comments on other people's appearances, yet who has never posted a picture of herself anywhere - and there are a couple of good reasons for that. The first is that she's been harassing people since the day she got an internet connection, and for the second, I'll quote a Detective in Noel's jurisdiction when he described her to me years ago. "She's built like a Green Bay Packers Linebacker but nowhere near as pretty."

She also makes comments to the effect that I only started blogging because she blogs, and I only care about copyrights since she violated Ben Gurecki's copyright. So, for the record:

I wrote on Newsvine for six and a half years, having been invited to join while the site was still in beta, and went on to win their highest award for citizen journalism, which they call the RAV. I am one of around 20 people to win that award - out of millions of members of the site. I then founded my own news-based social network, Free Bloggers Alliance. I am also the webmaster for the Velvet Underground Appreciation Society, and I often write there. I've been blogging for a very long time.

As for copyrights, well, I hold more than 600, having been a professional artist for thirty-eight years. Not only do I hold many copyrights - I understand copyright law. I have Masters degrees in Fine Art and Media Communications - and this (former?) Wal-Mart worker is going to explain copyrights to me?

In closing, Noel (the Stalker) Bednaz has no room to talk. She spends all of her time denigrating people who are superior to her in every way, and does it with the aplomb of a pissed off fourth grader. The one thing she's good at? Embarrassing herself. She does that on a regular basis.




edit: Noel again responds to a peace offering.

No comments:

Post a Comment